> In September this year The University of California Press published a > new book on Juenger. Already the title makes me suspicious: _A Dubious > Past - Ernst Juenger and the Politics of Literature after Nazism_ . > The author, Elliot Y. Neaman is a history professor at the University > of Sand Francisco. I have read this book in its original form as a PhD thesis and I have to say that it amounts to a very substantial and scholarly credible account of the reception of J in post-War Germany and the way in which conservative circles in particular attempted to mould a specific image of him. If I were to offer a critique of Neamann's book based on my vague recollection of it, it would be that he neglects to show how German left-wingers have equally tended to mould a very specific image of Juenger to suit their own agendas. Neamann's book is scholarly and rigorous, critical but by no means overly hostile and spiteful. > UCP claims that Neaman has made impressive investigations of published > and unpublished material, including letters, interviews, and other > media. The author is addressing, so the publishers, central questions > of German intellectual life. All true enough. But slowly EJ is escaping these specifically post-War, post-Third Reich debates even with Germany to be considered within different contexts. (that this perspective is going to take a long time to fade away is shown by the current exchanges around Sloterdijk). Guess it's easier for me as an Englishman to consider EJ from a different context. Regards, John
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.