John King wrote: The suggestion that his work might be of dubious quality > because he is Jewish is one that I explicitly reject. There is a difference between being a Jewish and being a zionist. The zionist point of view about the Freikorps is the one that I explicitly reject. Carlos Mancini > > > Furthermore, I believe that *all* historical research and discourse > emerges from an interaction between the historian's present and the > recoverable artefacts and documents (and whatever else) he or she is > working on. What makes the arts and humanities so interesting is the > debate between scholars who bring new perspectives which constantly > evolve. Thus, to reject someone's work because they have their own > position is to misunderstand what the arts and humanities are about. (That > said, we often have to pretend we have reached oracular certainty in our > research because that's what the rhetorical rules say, but that's a > completely different point). > > BTW, let's also not forget that the Freikorps were extremely brutal in > their indiscriminate political violence suppressing left-wing > insurrection. Following the Baltic expedition they were also involved in > politically motivated murder and terrorism. > > JK > ============================================================================== > John King > St. John's College > GB - Oxford OX1 3JP > ==============================================================================
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.