>recently I bought the 1950's first edition of Armin Mohler's "Die >Konservative Revolution". Before I start reading I would like to ask all >you EJ experts about your opinion: are the statements of the book still >relevant or is it completely obsolete after nearly fifty years? What do >you think are the special merits of this book (Mohler's Ph.D. thesis as >I learned)? I am the owner of the 1972 edition. Guess most of the difference is many additions. The 1972 is 554 pages. What fascinates me is Dr. Mohler's attempt to make "eternal recurrance" a main theme of the Conservative revolution (se A 3.6, "Grosse Mittag". M. quotes several fine poems. Here is part of FGJ's twelfth poem in "Perlenschnur": "Es dreht sich das Wasser in slibernem Kranz. Nie endet der Kreis, Nie endet der Tanaz. Hinauf, hinab In ewigem Gang Gehen die Wasser Geht der Gesang. Ein jeder Tropfen Von deinem Blut Okeanos ist er, Der niemals ruht" Mohler in A 3.8: "Wir haben zu zeigen versucht, wie ein Weltbild Gestalt annimmt. Wir umschrieben, wie sich dem durch Jahrhunderte Gueltigen linearen Weltbild ein voellig andersartiges Weltbild, das der Wiederkehr, entgegenzustellen beginnt. Das alles ist weit entfernt von der Politik und den politischen Ideologien, denen unsere Untersuchung gilt." (p. 109) Important is also to note Mohler on p. 113. "Widerkehr" is often incorrcetly understood as some sort of wandering of the soul. But here it means that a part returns again into the whole and again can leave the whole and appear as a part. The part changes, but the whole remains. The Nietsche use of "Wiederkegr des Gleichen" can be deceptive as an attempt of analysis is made. All in all Mohler's book is fascinating. Have a good read. Best wishes Bertil
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.