Another _Die Schere_ Contribution

[Bertil Haggman <bertil.haggman@helsingborg.se>]

J Barahona Ruiz wrote:

>   Bertil, I think of Saddam, and I think of the nuclear weapons of USA,
> France, Israel, China, India, Ucrania, Russia and so others. I think
> the problems with technology start when it is controlled by Power and
> its followers, no by a community of autonomous people, and serving the
> interests of Power, and not the necessities of these people. In our age
> this is supported by the `titanic` idea that it's the fate of humanity,
> seen as a whole, to conquer nature and to become new rulers of it.
> Science and technology have become the new religion and metaphysics, and
> the new god to pray, obbey,and sacrifice for is Power. Little power of
> cruel dictator Saddam doesn't want to submit to the big one of the `new
> world order`.

JBR,

As far as I understand "new world order" (nwo)
did not work as imagined. There has not been much
on nwo lately. We are moving into the area of
Titanism here, which would be my next choice
for contribution from the first part of _Die
Schere_. Also Saddam is not alone in this world.
Totalitarian forces still exist. The collapse
of the Soviet Union did not solve the majority
of problems. It might even have increased them
as we moved from duality to a multipolar world.

>  I've been reading very interested some of the letters by Einstein and
> Max Born. Last one was very concerned about the responsability of
> scientists in their discoveries and the use they could have. I think
> while States and Economy are over the decissions of people and most of
> scientists continue serving their interests (as it was not in times of
> Galileo and Servet, when scientists oppossed the power of Church), the
> only solution is not to trust them completely, at least to do our best
> to not let them doing all they want. Anyways, it's time for the anarch
> to observe, to listen carefully, to keep the distance and to decide how
> to write the most beautifully as possible his autobiography in these
> circumstances.

A few days ago continued directions from Ernst Juenger
stopped. But we still have his prognoses in
_Die Schere_ and elsewhere. And there might still 
be unpublished material which we can hope Klett-
Cotta will take good care of. But maybe you are
right that it is time for anarchs to observe,
listen and analyze. Readers of Ernst Juenger's
work know where to look, how to listen and analyze.
EJ provided the guides, hopefully.

Greetings

Bertil Haggman