> Maybe it would be more correct to > say that EJ is a bourgeois anti- > modernist and not use the left-right > scale. Sure, Juenger came from a bourgeois background and after retirement from the Reichswehr was able to earn enough to live comfortable but I feel the label "bourgeois anti-modernist" isn't quite right. What about "Der Arbeiter"? That would seem to be a modernist anti-bourgeois piece to me - as would much of the 20s stuff. Even with the later work - I think one would do EJ an injustice to label him bourgeois. Even if notions of the "Anarch" can be used to evade what one might broadly label ethical responsibilty - and which would thus suit those in an adequately leisured/well-off position (bourgeois) not prepared to dirty their hands changing the world one way or the other - the Anarch's non-committal to the world and refusal of instrumental intervention in the world is radically un-bourgeois. Exactly, Junger is primarily an anarch who by chance finds himself in the not-undesirable position of the bourgeois. He finds no reason to object to a role which is useful to his goals. The following paragraph from Eumeswil seems to explain it best. "The anarch differs from the anarchist in that he has a very pronounced sense of the rules. Insofar as and to the extent that he observes them, he feels exempt from thinking. This is consistent with normal behavior: everyone who boards a train rolls over bridges and through tunnels that engineers have devised for him and on which a hundred thousand hands have labored. This does not darken the passenger's mood; settling in comfortably, he buries himself in his newspaper, has breakfast, or thinks about his business. Likewise, the anarch - except that he always remains aware of that relationship, never losing sight of his main theme, freedom, that which also flies outside, past hill and dale. He can get away at any time, not just from the train, but also from any demand made on him by state, society, or church, and also from existence. He is free to donate existence to Being, not for any pressing reason but just as he likes, whether out of exuberance or out of boredom. Why do so many people strive for the career of petty functionary? No doubt because they have a sensible notion of happiness. They know the rules and their taboos. Time flows by nonchalantly. You are already half-way to Tibet. Plus the security. No state can do without minor officials, no matter how high the waves may surge. Of course, you have to keep a low profile." Pg. 146-147 Thomas Friese Association Eumeswil Vancouver, Canada - Florence, Italy "I am not an nonbeliever, but a man who demands something worth believing in. On this point, I am like a bride in her chamber: she listens for the softest step." Ernst Juenger, Eumeswil
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.