RE: EJ and the Political "Chessgame"

[rcalvom@ctv.es]

From:           	"Thomas Friese" <tfriese@intergate.bc.ca>
To:             	<ernst-juenger-l@maillist.ox.ac.uk>
Subject:        	RE: EJ and the Political "Chessgame"
Date sent:      	Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:19:43 -0800
Send reply to:  	ernst-juenger-l@maillist.ox.ac.uk

> Whoa! Does one need to join you in the same altered state to play the game?
> By the way, I suggest that such an allusion is in fact evidence for a
> non-anarchic nature

Certainly, I am not a anarch. I am an observer of the anarch - from
a bourgeoise position. And I would like to be one of its "painters".
I mean, in the chessgame:-)

 ... an anarch would likely not reveal this to the world,
> regardless of the real value or harmlessness of the practice. Why take any
> chances when you never know who is listening or how society may change?

Bad movement:-). The anarch offers information in  certain groups,
and when he decides- he believes in litle circles, see Eumeswill.
The anarch analize pragamatically the situations. talking about
THC is not dangerous anymore. More over, could be a funny,
popular detail of an autobiography:-). Modern anarch should take
account medias and publicity are including in the camouflage:-).
This is an example of two movements of the game.

> Better not to pronounce oneself publicly in such matters. That
said, I guess
> it is to Junger's credit that he can write a whole book on truly extreme
> experiences without becoming known as a fringe "druggie" - unlike some other
> modern writer/explorers of these realms.
>
There are a few correct, good explorers. J. Ott. Antonio
Escohotado, Alexander Shulgin are some of them.

> But please, now that you are presumably in our everyday world, can you
> redefine the game and its parameters. I like the idea. Then we can play ...
>
The game basis are simply. a: try do build the board- perhaps in a
noveled way. Draw the figures: anarch, bourgeoise, worker,
waldwanger, put them in "our everyday world". Place the enclosing
frame, the laws and the limits.
                                         b: once built, put the "figures" in action.
                                         c: try to do best, but with fair play.
                                         D: lŽart pour lŽart

Best regards
roberto

> Thomas Friese
>
> "I am not an nonbeliever, but a man who demands something worth believing
> in. On this point, I am like a bride in her chamber: she listens for the
> softest step." Ernst Juenger, Eumeswil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ernst-juenger-l@maillist.ox.ac.uk
> [mailto:owner-ernst-juenger-l@maillist.ox.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
> rcalvom@ctv.es
> Sent: February 2, 1999 4:12 AM
> To: ernst-juenger-l@maillist.ox.ac.uk
> Subject: EJ and the Political "Chessgame"
>
>
> So, finally, keeping a secret "math", drawing circles, we have touch
> the nerve: the Anarch and the bourgeoise. Well, this is a dialogue
> with great posibilities... But, in first place, I think it would be fine to
> place gameŽs board - or as Eumeswill Domo said: "first the board,
> then the game". We should build the enclosing frame, the lines,
> the squares, and finally the colours. Here it is the wood:
>
> Who is the bourgeoise? Historically? Can we describe "the
> borgoise" in this "strange days"? How? Which caracteristics?
> Are they enough and suficient to indetify him?
> Which is the place of the bourgeoise in Der Arbeiter universe? Put
> different, who is the bourgeoise in the global view?
> Which is the relationship between the Anarch and the bourgoise?
> Are they the very same person? If not, which are the differences?
>  Is it the Anarch a waldwanger hidden in the city? To say different
> is it the anarch a "chama-leon" camouflaged with grew "city
> colours"?.Hidden in the dense foliage of numbers of Der Arbeiter
> State, hidden in the "jungle-city"?.
>
>
> These and other questions  arise. We will try to respond them.
> That will be imposible. We cannot win the game. Finally, this is
> onle another disguise of the eternal knot: Fate and Liberty.
> But, I think we should feel obligued to build the board, and then,
> play the game. Do another thing, could be a dishonour to our
> Patres, our dead ones.
> Here is my first movemente, P4K:
>
> "A non-bourgeoise society only can be mainteined by Terror,
> and only a couple of years, after this time everybody is tired of it;
> without taking in count that wokers chiefs, in the meanwhile, have
> become new bourgeoises".
>
>                                                               Decisive Years
>                                                              Oswald Spengler
>
>
> Sorry for this crazy idea of a chessgame. But, at the same I was
> writing this I also was making an THC "annaherung". So this is the
> burlesque result:-)
>
> best regards
> roberto
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>