This brings with it the question of EJ's own belief in which he is laying out the potential for a super sensory order. Certianly if there is a view to the future then there must be some sort of map by which we may gain access. This means that fate is in this sense "written" and although I know little of Schopenhauer's Philosophy and have never heard of Grillparzer their view of predestination must be similiar to EJ's own view. The reason for second sight being proof of universal necessity indicates an ordered universe with an "author". This most certainly implies, naturally only through indication, the presence of the divine. Yes, but now who is the "author"? Could it not be the person himself, consciously choosing the life he/she will live, before, as Junger put it somewhere, they give "existence to Existence"? That is not in contradiction to your conclusion of the Divine presence. "Divinity must, without a doubt, be inside us and be recognized as being inside us; otherwise we would have no concept of gods." Eumeswil Carlos's previous point (copied below) is along these lines - the dreamer as divine self-creator. Point well taken, Carlos. "To my mind his thought about past-future and visions is nearer to shuŽar - an Amazonas tribe- culture. This tribe has a veri different conception of time. They think future is in the past. The preview donŽt imply an absence of free will. It means that our decision was already taken." I add a quote referring to dreams from Eumeswil (by far my favorite book, I confess..) "It (the mind during a dream) can open its eyes anywhere - in people, in things, animals or plants; it gives breath to its creatures and makes them speak; it acts as their prompter. Yet it is astonished by anything they say, as if its words were intensified by those echoes. 'In a dream we are gods,' a Greek said, and he was right." Eumeswil One final thought: these ideas remind me of a charming story quoted in Otto Rank's "The Trauma of Birth." In certain Gnostic writings, the unborn child is "dropped" by an angel into the womb of the mother who will bring it into the life it has chosen for itself. Just before the "drop" enters the womb, it is shown the entire course of its future life, including the place it will be buried. As it leaves the womb to be born, the angel strikes it under its nose and blots out all memory of everything it has seen. This perspective fits very well with what Junger is saying here - and what Carlos says - the decision was already taken. The vision reminds us of what we have forgotten. Thomas Friese "I am not a nonbeliever, but a man who demands something worth believing in. On this point, I am like a bride in her chamber: she listens for the softest step." Ernst Juenger, Eumeswil
Follow Ups to this Message
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.