> Dear list members, > > we should remember that the term "Widerstand" was used before 1933 by the > rigth-winged opponents of Weimar. The best example was Ernst Niekisch and > his "Widerstandskreis" - against Versailles, and another example ist the > little broschure "Kriegsgeneration / Widerstand", written by Hans Henning > Grote (Berlin w.y.). Men like Niekisch, Jünger and other > "Nationalrevolutionäre" upholded their "Widerstandshaltung" after 1933 - > because this was not the Drittes Reich they wanted. Too plebeian. In this > way, Jünger was "widerständig", but it was no active "Widerstand". That´s the point! Jünger and others wanted the Dritte Reich, but they were not d´accord with Hitler-and this doesn´t mean Widerstand! > > We should forget the view on the Nationalsozialismus as a monolithic block, > standing for a totally new and self-formed policy. Why was the NS so > successfully? Because it absorbed - besides its own rass-policy - many > parts of common german wishes and political targets. Like EJ himself said: > he was "d´accord" with Hitlers politics in 1938. Perhaps Jünger, and I hope so he did, meant only the foreign politics. Remember what happened even until 1938: Nürnberger Gesetze, "Reichskristallnacht"... > From 1940 to 1942 Jünger had several meetings with Werner Best in his > hotel-room in Paris. > Best had written an article "Der Krieg und das Recht" for the book "Krieg > und Krieger, edited bey EJ in 1930. Best was after 1933 the organisator of > the Gestapo and their second man behind Reinhard Heydrich until 1940. Then > he was kicked off from the Gestapa (Geheimes Staatspolizeiamt) because of > personal rivalries with Heydrich. From 1940 to 1942 Best was > Kriegsverwaltungschef in Paris. There is no doubt, that Best was a Nazi, > and it is clear that these meetings between Jünger and Best were in a > friendly atmosphere. So why did Jünger have to meet "Best"? > (I have read the letters from Best to Jünger in Marbach - has anyone seen > Best ementioned in the "Strahlungen? I am still waiting for the commented > edition with an index!) > > And, following Friedrich Hielscher, Best hold his hand on EJ after > Stalingrad: "Es wäre erwogen worden, Jünger und mich (Hielscher) > vorsorglich umzulegen, da der Einfluß solcher Geister in unseren Zeiten, > wie sie nach jener Niederlage nicht mehr ausgeschlossen schienen, ärgerlich > und unübersehbar zunehmen können. Da habe Best der Akte als sein Urteil > hinzugefügt, daß Jünger und ich harmlos seien und auch nichts anderes > wünschten als den Sieg Deutschlands..." (Hielscher, Fünfzig Jahre unter > Deutschen, 287) Personal friendships or protection from a nazi doesn´t mean WIDERSTAND!!! > Jünger and Best keeped up their correspondance until the death of Best in > 1989. > As I heard from a still living old man (no Nazi, but before and after 1933 > nationalist and "Volkstumsaktivist"): Best was one of the "good" Nazis... There were no good nazis. Never! > > We should see that single Nazis had different backgrounds and that there > had been f.e. connections between parts of the "Konservative Revolution" > and men who made later career in the NSDAP. One example is the "Bund > Oberland": many members went to Niekisch in 1929/30, others went to the > NSDAP like Richard Hildebrandt, later SS-Obergruppenführer and Höherer SS- > und Polizeiführer in Danzig-Westpreußen. > > I think we should start to discuss EJs "Der Friede". He wrote the first > concept for it in the beginning of 1942 (Strahlungen, 5.1.42) - one month > after the start of the the soviet winter-offensive and the crisis of > moscow, two weeks after the dismissal of Oberbefehlshaber des Heeres v. > Brauchitsch. Now the little Gefreiter Hitler was the new Oberbefehlshaber. > Had EJ now seen that this war was no more to win? > (I forgot: one month after Pearl Harbor) > EJ burned his first concept for "Der Friede" on August 18th in 1942, before > he left to Russia (See "Strahlungen"). > > Back in Paris, EJ wrote the second concept, starting on July 27th in 1943. > After Stalingrad, after landing of the first allied troops on Sicily (July > 10th). > > Germany had still ocuppied almost the whole of Europe, it was still in a > strong position. And it is clear to see, that EJ was writing "Der Friede" > from a position of strength: "Die Waffen müssen den Raum zur Entscheidung > schaffen, Raum für den geistigen Entwurf. In diesem Sinne ist es besser, > länger zu leiden, als Teile des Ganges aufzuschieben, um zurückzukehren zur > alten Welt (...) Der Friede kann kein Verständigungsfriede sein" > (the fear of a second Versailles...) And yet it was so typical for EJ in this period: der alte Narziß hat wieder einmal etwas geschrieben. > > In 1943 it seemed not too late, that Germany could decide alone on its > destiny, make a knightly peace with keeping of its power. This was EJs > view, and this was the view of the military opposition. In this way there > was an accord between EJ and the military opposition. Hans Speidel and > Rommel received "Der Friede" in 1943/44 before the 20th of July: "In den > ersten Julitagen des Jahres 1944 gab mir Erwin Rommel die Weisung, die > Friedensschrift `des großen Soldaten Ernst Jünger´ für eine > Veröffentlichung im In- und Ausland vorzubereiten" (Hans Speidel: Briefe > aus Paris und aus dem Kaukasus, in: Freundschaftliche Begegnungen. > Festschrift für EJ zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M. 1955, 192) And even if he did so, remember that Rommel´s role even nowaday remains ambigous and enigmatic. > > In contrary to the men of the 20th of July EJ did not recommend the > assault: "Wenn Kniébolo fällt, so wird die Hydra einen neuen Kopf bilden." > (Strahlungen, 497) And he was not the one to take an active part - he saw > himself oncemore as the elitarian spectator and chronicler, standing over > the things to happen. As he always did! And that is no resistance against the regime at all. > > "Der Friede" - what kind of peace and how to receive it, meant EJ? It certainly was an elite peace and where did he write about a democratic government? Sorry, couldn´t find it. I think EJ dreamt of a new regime without the warcrimes and pursuit of the jews. > > If some of you are interested to discuss "Der Friede" I could organize to > send you some special prints of it. Please email me directly for your > adresses. What are "special prints"? > > Regards, > Jan Zimmermann > > > > -- CU..... Andreas ************************************************************************ Andreas Heidelbauer Vogtshaldenstr. 5 D-72074 Tuebingen Tel.:+7071-26580 e-mail: mailto:ajhei@geocities.com mailto:ajhei@usa.net mailto:andreas.heidelbauer@student.uni-tuebingen.de Internet(Deutsch, English, Francais & Italiano mit Postkartenservice, with virtual postcards, avec cartes postales virtuelles, con cartoline virtuali): http://ajhei.notrix.de ************************************************************************
Follow Ups to this Message
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2009. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.