ernst jünger in cyberspace

mailing list archive - Juenger, Glaeserne Bienen and Micro Air Vehicles (MAV) [long]

One of the more fascinating Juenger books is the (I think untranslated)
Glaeserne Bienen (1960). The main figure of the book, Richard, visits
the home of the owner of a media empire (Zapparoni) who also owns
a number of industries. Waiting for Zapparoni in his garden Richard 
can hear what he thinks are bees flying around. He finds them odd
and catches one:

"An diesen Bienen fiel zunächst die groesse auf...Sie hatten etwa
den Umfang einer Walnuss, die noch in den gruenen Schale steckt.
Die Fluegel waren nicht beweglich wie Vogel- oder Insektenfluegel,
sondern sie waren als starrer Saum um den koerper herumgefuehrt,
also eher Stabilisierungs- und Tragflaechen. 

Die Groesse war weniger auffaellig, als man denken sollte, da das Tier
vollkommen durchsichtig war...So ging es mir, nachdem ich begriffen
haette, dass es sich hier nicht um eine neue Tierart, sondern um
Mechanismen handelte. Zapparoni, dieser Teufelskerl, hatte wieder
einmal der Natur ins Handwerk gepfuscht..."

I could not avoid thinking of Juenge's bees when reading the conference
report underneath.

Micro Air Vehicles Conference

Below is a summary of the Micro Air Vehicle Conference held last month
at
Georgia Tech.  Information on the availability of Proceedings will be
forthcoming once arrangements have been finalized.

LEARNING FROM THE BIRDS AND BEES: ENGINEERS LOOK TO INSECTS FOR IDEAS IN
DESIGNING TINY "MICRO AIR VEHICLES"

      Imagine an aircraft small enough to fit in the palm of your hand,
      yet able to fly into damaged buildings to search for survivors or
      onto battlefields to detect toxic chemicals.

      "Micro Air Vehicles" capable of these and other tasks are the
      goals for a new program proposed by the Defense Advanced Research
      Projects Agency (DARPA). The technical challenges of building such
      air vehicles was the focus for a two-day conference held at the
      Georgia Institute of Technology February 19-20.

      The agenda for the "First International Conference on Emerging
      Technologies for Micro Air Vehicles" included 17 technical
      presentations from more than a dozen organizations studying the
      rapidly-expanding area, as well as presentations from officials of
      DARPA and the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office (DARO).

      "When you approach technical people with this idea, their first
      response is that you cannot build an aircraft this small and make
      it useful," said Dr. Sam Blankenship, conference co- chair and
      coordinator of the "MicroFlyer" program, the Georgia Institute of
      Technology's micro air vehicle effort. "But many people, including
      us, think you can do this."

      Designers of micro air vehicles face formidable challenges and a
      host of unknowns.

      No flying vehicles of this size currently exist, meaning designers
      must look to birds and insects for information about flight
      principles on a scale this small. Researchers believe aerodynamic
      principles governing aircraft with six-inch wings may be
      significantly different from those that have guided aircraft
      design since the Wright Brothers' 1903 airplane.

      "There may be something about very small sizes that changes the
      aerodynamics," Blankenship explained. "The Wright Flyer made
      smaller and smaller and smaller ultimately won't work, and we'll
      probably have to use some other method to get efficient motion in
      an aircraft this small. We may have to learn from insects and
      birds."

      Beyond basic aerodynamic techniques, severe weight restrictions
      demand new types of flight controls, power sources, propulsion
      systems and avionics to fit within the 50 grams (two ounces)
      allowed for the vehicle and its payload.

      Full-sized aircraft use motors and hydraulic actuators to move
      wing and tail structures that provide directional control, for
      instance. Because of the weight associated with those devices,
      however, MicroFlyers must use radically different control
      techniques.

      Georgia Tech engineers are developing innovative control concepts.
      Research Engineer Robert Roglin in the Georgia Tech Research
      Institute (GTRI) is investigating electrically-actuated
      piezoelectric structures that differentially alter lift. Robert J.
      Englar, a principal research engineer in GTRI, is applying
      techniques for directing engine thrust across the wings.

      Researchers at several institutions are studying tiny jet turbine
      engines, pulsejets, ducted fans and other concepts for propulsion.
      But since the MicroFlyers could contact humans during their search
      missions, whirring rotor blades or exposed propellers may be too
      dangerous to use.

      Batteries or other electrical sources offer another challenge, as
      do guidance and navigation systems -- and the tiny payloads that
      will transmit television images or sniff the air for contaminants.
      Recent advances in micro electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) and
      microelectronics technology give engineers confidence that systems
      that tiny could one day be practical.

      At Georgia Tech, for instance, researchers have been working to
      integrate multiple functions into single chips. Progress to date
      has demonstrated integrated image acquisition, processing and data
      compression, including demonstration of optical-through- wafer
      interconnects. Drs. Joy Laskar, Nan Marie Jokerst, Martin Brooke,
      April Brown and Scott Wills in the School of Electrical and
      Computer Engineering make up this project team developing the
      chips.

      Researchers including Nile Hartman and Bob Schwerzel in GTRI are
      working on the area of miniaturized integrated-optic chemical and
      biological sensor systems.

      Though flown under human control, the MicroFlyers must be
      independent enough to avoid obstacles and maintain stable flight
      by themselves.

      "Flying a remote-controlled helicopter is extremely difficult, and
      even experienced people crash them all the time," Blankenship
      said. "These aircraft will need autonomy so we don't have to spend
      a lot of time training people to operate them."

      Since they may search environments containing toxic chemicals or
      biological hazards, the MicroFlyers must also be inexpensive
      enough to be thrown away. Designers are aiming at a $1,000
      per-unit cost for the expendable vehicles.

      The effort to design MicroFlyers involves many different technical
      challenges, so Blankenship believes only organizations with broad
      interdisciplinary expertise will be successful in building them.

      "We're not really sure what will turn out to be the most difficult
      challenge," he added. "Nobody has ventured into this realm
      before."

      Speakers at the conference included Dr. James McMichael,
      Director of the micro Air Vehicle (microAV) program in the Defense
      Advanced Research Projects Agency, and Col. Michael Francis,
      former director of the microAV program.

      Information about the conference is on the World Wide Web at:
     <http://spbtrc.gtri.gatech.edu/MicroVehicle>

      Program for the Conference is at:
      <http://spbtrc.gtri.gatech.edu:80/MicroVehicle/register.htm>


Bertil Haggman
bertil.haggman@helsingborg.se


Follow Ups to this Message

Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.