John King wrote: > So, was heißt plutonische Energie? It's a little obscure... Of course. EJ is often a multi- visionary. Is it too simple to believe that plutonic energy is just nuclear energy. But EJ also, if I remember correctly sometimes writes about uranium = Uranos. "Die Titanen beduerfen keiner Gebete; ihnen wird durch Arbeit gedient. Sie werden hoch geachtet, obwohl ihr Name sich hinter ihrem Wirken verbirgt. So sagt man heute nich mehr Uranos, sondern Uran. Auch Pluton, obwohl erdmaechtig, zaehlt nicht zum Olymp." _Prognosen_, p.37 > And a telling commentary from Hollywood's master of logistics, Cameron, > about the role of technology. Especially considering that his framing > narrative is little more than a trite apotheosis of late 20th century > technology and the American Way of Life. But I think everyone already knows > what I think of "Titanic". Yes, we do, and the film is not without faults. And the Titanic metaphor is haunting in a time when technical inventions com almost by the day and month, not years and decades anymore. Best wishes Bertil Haggman bertil.haggman@helsingborg.se
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2013. Web archive generated Thu, 20th May 2010.