EJs warnings about technology are some of the=20 most profound in world literature after World War II. Technology does not only lead to mortal catastrophies, it is the mortal catastrophe itself. Even liberal technology enthusiasts are now expressing doubts about the development. The former LBJ assistant futurist John Naisbitt in his latest book (_High Tech/High Touch_, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2001) is weathering concern. He i still basically optimistic and believes that technology supports and improves human life. But it can also narrow and confine the human spirit. Technology favors the quick fix and makes us fear and worship. Technology can lead some to distance themselves from what's real and meaningful. Since the 1960's traditions have been dismantled and they are replaced with easy alternatives. Naisbitt believes that genetic technologies will overwhelm all other technologies in the coming century. Germline engineering will give man the power to direct his evolution, changing the genetic code and passing it on generations afterward. To alter the human gene pool is a very serious concern for science, so Naisbitt. Are we coming nearer to the "perfect catastrophe" or is germline engineering moving us forward and offering new opportunities in medicine etc?=20 An interesting aspect is also EJs view that technology cannot develop indefinitely but only so far as to the point that it controls everything. A this point, at this perfection, (compare F.G. Juenger's _Perfektion der Technik_) it changes into a static mode of magic. With juengerian greetings Bertil
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.