Now, onto Günter's contribution... I think we are lucky that we have a relatively low noise ratio on the list. Probably because you have to join it to make a contribution, which is not the case with USENET or perl-script based bulletin board systems. >Internet public. It is not only hormonal malfunctions but also current >ideological disorders (in February we encountered, I guess, the leftist, now we >seem to have the feminist variety among us) that makes people flock to EJ to Ideological disorder strikes to me as a bit strong. Much more a case of juvenilia - I would have no problem with left-wing/feminist critiques of Jünger on the list. It would brighten things up a bit :-) Just wait for my post-modernist reading of "Sturm"! >time, but when EJ published ÜBER NATIONALISMUS UND JUDENFRAGE (Süddeutsche >Monatshefte, September 1930) he added, as I see it, respectability to that >attitude. Even if its content was not very different from the mainstream >thinking Just to clarify for those who don't know this article, frequently cited by J's opponents, it ends with the infamous lines: "Im gleichen Maße jedoch, in dem der deutsche Wille an Schärfe und Gestalt gewinnt, wird für den Juden auch der leiseste Wahn, in Deutschland Deutscher sein zu können, unvollziehbarer werden, und er wird sich vor seiner letzten Alternative sehen, die lautet: in Deutschland entweder Jude zu sein oder nicht zu sein." rough translation: "To the same degree that German will grows in focus and form it will become ever harder for the Jew to realise even the slightest delusion of being a German in Germany. He will find himself faced with his last choice - either to be a Jew in Germany or not to be." >of that time our post-Auschwitz sensibility makes that text painful reading >today. Indeed. The text is more complex. For instance J specifically rejects the metaphors of (e.g.) bacterial infection that characterised so much of Nazi and völkisch antisemitism. His rhetoric is against what he calls the "Zivilisationsjude" who is said to be little more than the product of "liberalism". He argues that the liberalism attempts to deny the existence of the Jews by erasing human difference. A strong German state with accompanying sense of patria is said to automatically mean the existence of Jews, who deny that Germany is their Fatherland. J goes on to argue (or, rather state) that: "In dem Augenblick, jedoch, in dem der Jude als eine eigentümliche und eigenen Gesetzen unterworfene Macht unverkennbar wird, hört er auf, am Deutschen virulent und damit gefährlich zu sein." ="At precisely that moment, however, in which the Jew becomes unmistakable as a particular force subject to his own laws he ceases to infest [bessere Übersetzung für am D. virulent sein?] the German and thus ceases to be dangerous." in other words, a (Zionist?) recognition of difference would diffuse the situation. Although the article is, like most of J's journalism, full of contradictions amongst it big words, and is bathed in anti-semitic sentiment it would be foolish to read it as a manifesto for Auschwitz. But it remains explosive. >arrogant claim to explain the world, world history and the world of the future in >one fell swoop. A bit like Marx and Lenin :-) Such meta-narratives are characteristic of modernity's thinking on history. That they no longer hold is one of the manifold dimensions of the debate on postmodernism. I see the Jünger of the 20s desperately trying to reconstruct centered and coherent accounts of the world, the pinnacle of which was probably "Der Arbeiter" as he cooled down from his nationalistic rhetoric. But contrast to "Das abenteuerliche Herz". >SCHERE project, a close reading and ideological discussion of DER ARBEITER. >Anyone on the List interested? Yes. Me. In just over a couple of months I'll be trying to get a dissertation chapter on it together and any exchanges on it would be most welcome. Best wishes, John =================================================================== John King Peterstraße 39b D-20355 Hamburg Tel: +49 (040) 35 11 78 ===================================================================
Follow Ups to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.