Cf. also http://www.ruthvilmi.net/hut/spring95/newsgroup/fi/msg00130.html, etc, etc, It would seem - from a short perusal of a couple of searches on Google, that "indogermanisch" is generally still widely used in universities and serious institutions, whereas "indogermanic" turns up a significantly higher proportion of "Aryan" type sites which use "indogermanic" to refer to some putative, original "folk" authenticity (and we all know what that means...). John [obviously not working hard enough this afternoon...] -----Original Message----- From: martin krueger [mailto:thingyding@inwind.it] Sent: 24 July 2001 14:37 To: juenger-list@juenger.org Subject: Re: [Juenger-list] EJ, DIE SCHERE #72: Note 1: Fantasy and Utopia EJ, DIE SCHERE #72: Note 1 The latter are in their > turn tersely and graphically corroborated by famous words of Heraclitus and > Napoleon. David and Goliath! Dear friends of the list! Is there someone who can explain me why J continued to call the indoeuropean languages indogermanic languages? Regards, m _______________________________________________ Juenger-list mailing list Juenger-list@juenger.org http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/juenger-list
Follow Ups to this Message
Markup © John King, July 2001.