> Daß Lazarus als Individuum auferweckt wird, ist unbedeutend, vielleicht > auch ärgerlich. .../... > Nebensächlich bleibt dabei die Frage, ob jene Erwekkung auch > stattgefunden hat. Notes Is it totally clear ? Nowadays, from 500 days of year 2000, there are evidences that the resurrection of Lazare is a myth. Same for the ascension, the assumption, immaculate conception, shroud of Torino etc. The supposed reality of the R is not minor, it's simply not. The interest is, as EJ says, the powerfull of the myth. This remark because there is a mix of several notions (if considered #16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) : the myths, the path of life, science of physics. The myth is typically a sort of propaganda which mobilizes human brain. Wait for translation of #19 for more about physics. Greetings richard
Replies to this Message
Markup © John King, 2008. Web archive generated Tue, 21st August 2007.